Harnick v. Woodrock Amusement Corp.
224 A.D. 662
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1928
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
This text of 224 A.D. 662 (Harnick v. Woodrock Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harnick v. Woodrock Amusement Corp., 224 A.D. 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Order denying motion for an injunction pendente lite affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Rich, Young and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Seeger, J., dissent, being of opinion that an implied term of the paper writing is that plaintiff should have the sole right to vend candies in the premises.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
224 A.D. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harnick-v-woodrock-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1928.