Harnick v. Harnick
444 So. 2d 87, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1984·No. No. 83-1340·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harnick v. Harnick, 444 So. 2d 87, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
444 So. 2d 87 (Harnick v. Harnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. Vaillancourt
634 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)