Harnick v. Harnick
444 So. 2d 87, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1340
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 444 So. 2d 87 (Harnick v. Harnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harnick v. Harnick, 444 So. 2d 87, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jacobs v. Vaillancourt
634 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
444 So. 2d 87, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harnick-v-harnick-fladistctapp-1984.