Harness v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harness v. State

1913 OK CR 342, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 647, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1913

DocketNo. A-1874.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 342 (Harness v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harness v. State, 1913 OK CR 342, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 647, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CIJRIAM.

The plaintiff in error, John Alden Harness, was convicted at the August, 1912, term of the coimty court of Woodward county on a < charge of simple assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75.00. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and cannot at this time be made to respond to the judgement of the court on the merits of the appeal. No answer has been filed to the showing made on behalf of the state. It is therefore taken as confessed. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CIJRIAM.

The plaintiff in error, John Alden Harness, was convicted at the August, 1912, term of the coimty court of Woodward county on a < charge of simple assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75.00. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and cannot at this time be made to respond to the judgement of the court on the merits of the appeal. No answer has been filed to the showing made on behalf of the state. It is therefore taken as confessed. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 342, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 647, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harness-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.