Harness v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harness v. State

1913 OK CR 342, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 647, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 13, 1913·No. No. A-1874.·Published

Opinion

PER CIJRIAM.

The plaintiff in error, John Alden Harness, was convicted at the August, 1912, term of the coimty court of Woodward county on a < charge of simple assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75.00. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and cannot at this time be made to respond to the judgement of the court on the merits of the appeal. No answer has been filed to the showing made on behalf of the state. It is therefore taken as confessed. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CIJRIAM.

The plaintiff in error, John Alden Harness, was convicted at the August, 1912, term of the coimty court of Woodward county on a < charge of simple assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75.00. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the plaintiff in error has become a fugitive from justice and cannot at this time be made to respond to the judgement of the court on the merits of the appeal. No answer has been filed to the showing made on behalf of the state. It is therefore taken as confessed. The motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal accordingly dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

Harness v. State, 1913 OK CR 342, 135 P. 1193, 10 Okla. Crim. 647, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK CR 342 (Harness v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.