Harner v. New York State Harness Racing Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harner v. New York State Harness Racing Commission

12 A.D.2d 987, 210 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12609

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 987 (Harner v. New York State Harness Racing Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harner v. New York State Harness Racing Commission, 12 A.D.2d 987, 210 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously annulled, with $50 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Following a hearing, respondent found that petitioners violated rule 18 (§ 4 [P]) of the New York State Harness Racing Commission Rules by driving in a manner unsatisfactory to the judges due to indifference or lack of effort and suspended their licenses. We find no substantial evidence in support of these findings. (Review of the determination of the State Harness Racing Commission, affirming the suspension of petitioners’ licenses for driving harness horses for five days, by judges at Batavia Downs, which proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division for determination by order of Erie Special Term.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously annulled, with $50 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Following a hearing, respondent found that petitioners violated rule 18 (§ 4 [P]) of the New York State Harness Racing Commission Rules by driving in a manner unsatisfactory to the judges due to indifference or lack of effort and suspended their licenses. We find no substantial evidence in support of these findings. (Review of the determination of the State Harness Racing Commission, affirming the suspension of petitioners’ licenses for driving harness horses for five days, by judges at Batavia Downs, which proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division for determination by order of Erie Special Term.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 987, 210 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harner-v-new-york-state-harness-racing-commission-nyappdiv-1961.