Harned v. Revell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2010
Docket10-7150
StatusUnpublished

This text of Harned v. Revell (Harned v. Revell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harned v. Revell, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7150

KEITH V. HARNED,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SARA REVELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02129-FL)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith V. Harned, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith V. Harned, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28

U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Harned v. Revell, No. 5:09-hc-02129-FL (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harned v. Revell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harned-v-revell-ca4-2010.