Harnage v. State

680 So. 2d 626, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 1996 WL 583150
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1996·No. No. 96-610·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

In the instant case the appellant Harnage, 17 years of age, offered a nolo plea to burglary and theft charges as an adult subject to a maximum adult sentence of four and one-half years rather than be sentenced as a youthful offender, which entailed a possible sentence of six years. The trial court agreed and subsequently sentenced Harnage to seven years incarceration without affording him the opportunity to withdraw his plea as required by Goins v. State, 672 So.2d 80 (Fla.1996). We also note that the scoresheet utilized by the sentencing judge contained an incorrect recommended and permitted sentencing range.

Appellant’s conviction and sentence are reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

W. SHARP and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harnage v. State, 680 So. 2d 626, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 1996 WL 583150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

680 So. 2d 626 (Harnage v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peeples v. State
719 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Greene v. State
686 So. 2d 739 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)