Harmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Fourth Circuit

Harmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

90 F. App'x 28

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 18, 2004·No. No. 04-1107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kerwin S. Harmon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit against his employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, for recovery of wages withheld in accordance with a tax lien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harmon v. WMATA, No. CA-03-28-DKC (D. Md. filed Nov. 26, 2003 & entered Dec. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kerwin S. Harmon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit against his employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, for recovery of wages withheld in accordance with a tax lien. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harmon v. WMATA, No. CA-03-28-DKC (D. Md. filed Nov. 26, 2003 & entered Dec. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 90 F. App'x 28 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 28 (Harmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related