Harmon v. Town of Bessemer City

158 S.E. 255, 200 N.C. 690, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 415
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 29, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 S.E. 255 (Harmon v. Town of Bessemer City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harmon v. Town of Bessemer City, 158 S.E. 255, 200 N.C. 690, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 415 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

ClaüKsoN, J.

The plaintiff, as he had the right, did not sue for permanent damage to his land. The defendant, as it had the right, being a municipality with the right to condemn the land, an easement for sewerage purposes, did not in its answer pray that this be done and permanent damages assessed.

The plaintiff excepted and assigned error to the third issue submitted by the court: “What permanent damages is the plaintiff entitled to recover ?”

The plaintiff tendered issue as to temporary damage and excepted and assigned error as to the issue o-f permanent damage submitted by the court. We think the exception and assignment of error well taken. This whole matter has been recently discussed in Wagner v. Conover, ante, 82.

On the record plaintiff is entitled to a

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Asheville v. Resurgence Development Co.
748 S.E.2d 751 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 255, 200 N.C. 690, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-v-town-of-bessemer-city-nc-1931.