Harmon v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Harmon v. State

571 P.2d 108, 93 Nev. 552, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 624

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 16, 1977

DocketNo. 9945

StatusPublished

This text of 571 P.2d 108 (Harmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmon v. State, 571 P.2d 108, 93 Nev. 552, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 624 (Neb. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Convicted by jury verdict of robbery (NRS 200.380), Juanita [553]*553Harmon claims there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict. We disagree.

The record indicates, inter alia, that (1) Harmon was identified by the victim as the perpetrator of the robbery, and (2) in statements to police officers, Harmon indicated she had committed the crime. In light of these facts, we conclude there is substantial evidence to support the verdict and, thus, it will not be disturbed on appeal. Watkins v. State, 93 Nev. 100, 560 P.2d 921 (1977); Nix v. State, 91 Nev. 613, 541 P.2d 1 (19751, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI