Harmon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harmon v. State

550 S.W.3d 148

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 3, 2018

DocketWD 80333

StatusPublished

This text of 550 S.W.3d 148 (Harmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmon v. State, 550 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Howard Harmon ("Harmon") appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Harmon was convicted, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 569.020. In his Rule 29.15 motion, as relevant to this appeal, Harmon claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly object to the testimony of the robbery victim and the sister of the deceased victim. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Howard Harmon ("Harmon") appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief by the Circuit Court of Jackson County. Harmon was convicted, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 569.020. In his Rule 29.15 motion, as relevant to this appeal, Harmon claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to properly object to the testimony of the robbery victim and the sister of the deceased victim. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 S.W.3d 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-v-state-moctapp-2018.