Harmon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harmon v. State

341 S.W.3d 213, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, 2011 WL 1842747

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2011

DocketWD 71627

StatusPublished

This text of 341 S.W.3d 213 (Harmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmon v. State, 341 S.W.3d 213, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, 2011 WL 1842747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Harmon was convicted of murder in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree, and armed criminal action. Harmon moved for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15, alleging that his counsel was ineffective because she failed to adequately investigate, and present evidence indicating, that tire tracks associated with an unidentified vehicle were present at the scene where the victim’s body was discovered. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Harmon was convicted of murder in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree, and armed criminal action. Harmon moved for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15, alleging that his counsel was ineffective because she failed to adequately investigate, and present evidence indicating, that tire tracks associated with an unidentified vehicle were present at the scene where the victim’s body was discovered. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 S.W.3d 213, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, 2011 WL 1842747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-v-state-moctapp-2011.