Harmon v. McCormack

1913 OK 587, 135 P. 1052, 42 Okla. 63, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 296
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 14, 1913·No. 3210·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*64 Opinion by

GALBRAITIT, C.

The plaintiff in error appeals from the judgment of the county court of Tulsa county by petition in error and case-made. It appears, however, that nothing is presented for review by the record in this case, for the reason that the case-made is not authenticated as required by statute (section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910). The case-made appears to have been signed by the trial judge on October 7, 1911, but it was not attested by the clerk, and the seal of the court was not attached thereto, nor was it filed with the papers in the case.

It follows that the appeal must be dismissed on authority of Stallard v. Knapp, 9 Okla. 591, 60 Pac. 234; Marple v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ National Bank, 28 Okla. 810, 115 Pac. 1124; Brook et al. v. United Mine Workers of America, 36 Okla. 106, 128 Pac. 236.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harmon v. McCormack, 1913 OK 587, 135 P. 1052, 42 Okla. 63, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 296 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 587 (Harmon v. McCormack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Surety Co. v. Little
1931 OK 600 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Doolittle v. Current
1926 OK 835 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Kinnon v. Cote Piano Mfg. Co.
1923 OK 789 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)