Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Harmon v. Davis

Harmon v. Davis

117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 112, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 287
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 10, 1923
Docket14193
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.E. 122 (Harmon v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harmon v. Davis, 117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 112, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 287 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the particular facts of the case the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur. E. W. Maynard, John E. Morris Jr,, for plaintiff. Bussell Snoiu, S. Spencer Bennet, Bennet & Branch, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 122, 30 Ga. App. 112, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-v-davis-gactapp-1923.