Harmon v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harmon v. Blum

81 A.D.2d 585, 440 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11071

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 585 (Harmon v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmon v. Blum, 81 A.D.2d 585, 440 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11071 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated July 31, 1979 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to terminate petitioner’s grant of assistance in the category of home relief. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to reinstate petitioner’s grant of assistance and to reimburse her for any moneys which may have been withheld. The State commissioner’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence in that the petitioner’s uncontradicted testimony was not incredible. Margett, J.P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated July 31, 1979 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to terminate petitioner’s grant of assistance in the category of home relief. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to reinstate petitioner’s grant of assistance and to reimburse her for any moneys which may have been withheld. The State commissioner’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence in that the petitioner’s uncontradicted testimony was not incredible. Margett, J.P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 585, 440 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-v-blum-nyappdiv-1981.