Harmon National Real Estate Corp. v. Feyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harmon National Real Estate Corp. v. Feyk

256 A.D. 1086, 12 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 1086 (Harmon National Real Estate Corp. v. Feyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmon National Real Estate Corp. v. Feyk, 256 A.D. 1086, 12 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Cross-appeals by plaintiff and defendant from an order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to strike out for insufficiency the first, second and fourth defenses and counterclaims. On appeal by plaintiff from so much of the order as denies its motion with respect to the first and fourth defenses and counterclaims, order affirmed, without costs. The court is of opinion that the facts of the ease should be developed before a determination is made as to the validity of the first defense and counterclaim. On appeal by defendant from so much of the order as grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second defense and counterclaim, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross-appeals by plaintiff and defendant from an order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion to strike out for insufficiency the first, second and fourth defenses and counterclaims. On appeal by plaintiff from so much of the order as denies its motion with respect to the first and fourth defenses and counterclaims, order affirmed, without costs. The court is of opinion that the facts of the ease should be developed before a determination is made as to the validity of the first defense and counterclaim. On appeal by defendant from so much of the order as grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second defense and counterclaim, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 1086, 12 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harmon-national-real-estate-corp-v-feyk-nyappdiv-1939.