Harmeyer v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Harmeyer v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.

13 Ohio Law. Abs. 146

DecidedApril 4, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ohio Law. Abs. 146 (Harmeyer v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harmeyer v. Reid, Murdoch & Co., 13 Ohio Law. Abs. 146 (Ohio Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSS, PJ.

The proceeding under the Bulk Sales Law (811103-1, GC), to have the purchaser declared a trustee has been held to be a case in chancery. 2 Ohio Jurisprudence 116, §83; Romeo & Co., Inc. v Nassif, 7 Oh Ap, 382.

This case therefore not being one of those of which the Municipal Court has been given jurisdiction in chancery is outside of the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and the demurrer was properly sustained.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, reversing the judgment of the Municipal Court, will be reversed, and the judgment of the Municipal Court will be affirmed.

Judgment reversed.

HAMILTON and CUSHING, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI