Harman v. State

308 S.W.3d 306, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2010 WL 1554586
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 2010·No. ED 93461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Harman (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harman v. State, 308 S.W.3d 306, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 479, 2010 WL 1554586 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

308 S.W.3d 306 (Harman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
308 S.W.3d 306 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)