Harman v. Remsen
This text of 23 How. Pr. 174 (Harman v. Remsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff seeks by an injunction in this action to restrain proceedings in two other actions, both of which are in this court. If the commencement of this action furnishes a reason for staying the proceedings in those, applications should be made in each of them upon notice for an order staying their proceedings until the determination of this.
An injunction will not be issued in one action to stay the proceedings in another, when both are in the same court. (Arndt agt. Williams, 16 How., 244; Dedrick agt. Hoysradt, 4 How., 350; Hunt agt. Farmers’ Loan Co., 8 How., 416; Grant agt. Quick, 5 Sand., 612.)
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 How. Pr. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harman-v-remsen-nysupct-1862.