Harman v. Bunch

462 F. App'x 319
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2012
DocketNo. 11-1748
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 462 F. App'x 319 (Harman v. Bunch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harman v. Bunch, 462 F. App'x 319 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Millard Burton Harman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harman v. Bunch, No. 3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD, 2011 WL 2441678 (E.D.Va. June 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gurpreet Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
699 F.3d 321 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 F. App'x 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harman-v-bunch-ca4-2012.