Harlow v. State
156 S.E. 286, 42 Ga. App. 417, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 437
This text of 156 S.E. 286 (Harlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harlow v. State, 156 S.E. 286, 42 Ga. App. 417, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 437 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
While the evidence connecting the defendant with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, it was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 286, 42 Ga. App. 417, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlow-v-state-gactapp-1930.