Harlow v. Borough of Wilkinsburg

42 A. 135, 189 Pa. 443, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 665
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1899
DocketAppeal, No. 167
StatusPublished

This text of 42 A. 135 (Harlow v. Borough of Wilkinsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlow v. Borough of Wilkinsburg, 42 A. 135, 189 Pa. 443, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 665 (Pa. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiffs did have the action of the engineer upon their entire claim, including items for which they now seek to recover, and his decision was against the allowance of these items. After that, and with a full knowledge of all the circumstances, and without even an allegation of fraud, mistake or accident, the plaintiffs executed a receipt in full for the whole amount allowed them by the engineer, and it is too late for them now to repeat the claim, either in an action at law, or in any other manner. The learned court below was clearly right in granting the nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A. 135, 189 Pa. 443, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlow-v-borough-of-wilkinsburg-pa-1899.