Harlow v. Becktle

1 Blackf. 215, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 32
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harlow v. Becktle. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Blackf. 237
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1822·Published

Opinion

UPON an affidavit showing the plaintiff in error to be a nonresident, a rule was granted calling on him to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of security for costs.— The security was afterwards given, and the rule discharged (1).

Acc. Harlin's heirs v. Eastland, Hard. 310. Vide Lewis v. Ovens, 5 Barn, & Ald. 265. In an original suit, a non-resident plaintiff must give security for costs, if required by the defendant. Cox v. Hunt, ante, p. 146, and note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harlow v. Becktle, 1 Blackf. 215, 1822 Ind. LEXIS 32 (Ind. 1822).

1 Blackf. 215 (Harlow v. Becktle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.