Harlington Realty Corp. v. S.L.G. Discount Corp.

162 A.D.2d 176, 556 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered on May 25, 1989, denying the motion by defendant S.L.G. Discount Corp. to dismiss the complaint, is unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action by plaintiffs insurer, the lease provided for mutual release and waiver of the right of subrogation by either party’s insurer, only if each party’s insurance policy [177] contained a clause providing that such a release or waiver would not invalidate the policy or increase its premiums. Plaintiffs insurer clearly reserved its right to subrogate for losses based upon claims paid by it on the insured’s behalf. Accordingly, there was no valid mutual release and waiver of the right to subrogation, and plaintiffs insurer was thus entitled to maintain this claim. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harlington Realty Corp. v. S.L.G. Discount Corp., 162 A.D.2d 176, 556 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

162 A.D.2d 176 (Harlington Realty Corp. v. S.L.G. Discount Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Insurance Corp. v. Cohoes Realty Associates, L.P.
50 A.D.3d 1228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.
2002 UT 62 (Utah Supreme Court, 2002)