Harlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Harlin v. State

271 S.W. 623, 99 Tex. Crim. 610

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 22, 1925

DocketNo. 9397.

StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.W. 623 (Harlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harlin v. State, 271 S.W. 623, 99 Tex. Crim. 610 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Hill County of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment sufficiently charges the offense and is followed by the charge of the court.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Hill County of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment sufficiently charges the offense and is followed by the charge of the court.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 S.W. 623, 99 Tex. Crim. 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlin-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.