Harlib v. Harlib
This text of 15 A.D.2d 883 (Harlib v. Harlib) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[884]*884Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally and Bergan, JJ.; Eager and Steuer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the defendant did not receive a fair trial, in that there were errors in the charge and in the exclusion of testimony and for the additional reason that there was undue participation by the court in the examination of witnesses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 883, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlib-v-harlib-nyappdiv-1962.