Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. RITE AID CORPORATION

986 A.2d 47, 604 Pa. 324, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2672, 2009 WL 4840233
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 16, 2009·No. 121 EM 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, deemed an Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, is GRANTED, the order below is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to reconsider its order. In its reconsideration, the Superior Court is directed to consider and apply Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Banking, 597 Pa. 1, 948 A.2d 790 (2008), Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wickett, 563 Pa. 595, 763 A.2d 813 (2000), General Accident Ins. Co. of America v. Allen, 547 Pa. 693, 692 A.2d 1089 (1997), and any other applicable decisions of this Court cited by the parties. The Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum of Law is DENIED,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. RITE AID CORPORATION, 986 A.2d 47, 604 Pa. 324, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2672, 2009 WL 4840233 (Pa. 2009).

986 A.2d 47 (Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. RITE AID CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz-Ortiz v. Clerk of Court, Court of Common Pleas
986 A.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)