Harley W. Miller, and v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary

427 F.2d 710, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8280
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 8, 1970·No. 24238_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order denying habeas corpus after a full evidentiary hearing is affirmed.

We agree with the district court that there was not an adequate showing of ineffectiveness of counsel in the sense of farce or sham. The issue of promises of leniency was resolved against petitioner on a question of fact.

The question of not knowing the consequences of the guilty plea would be serious if Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, is retroactive, but we have seen no indication that it is.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harley W. Miller, and v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary, 427 F.2d 710, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8280 (9th Cir. 1970).

427 F.2d 710 (Harley W. Miller, and v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tahl v. O'CONNOR
336 F. Supp. 576 (S.D. California, 1971)