Harley v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

132 A.2d 129, 213 Md. 652
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 5, 2001
Docket[H.C. No. 5, September Term, 1957 (Adv.).]
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 132 A.2d 129 (Harley v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harley v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 132 A.2d 129, 213 Md. 652 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

Henderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted of operating a lottery and possession of number slips, in a trial before the court in Montgomery County, sitting without a jury, and sentenced to three years and six months, respectively, the sentences to run consecutively. He contends that he was deprived of his constitutional right against self-incrimination, in that a police officer volunteered a statement that the accused had “informed us that he had been arrested *653 for an alleged gambling violation about three years previous to this arrest”. At this point, the court of its own motion ordered the statement stricken from the record. Counsel for the accused moved for a mistrial, which the court overruled. The accused did not take the stand, because, he says, of his prior criminal record. He complains that his counsel did not enter an appeal, although he did file a motion for new trial, which was overruled.

It has been repeatedly held that the correctness of the rulings of a trial court on the admissibility of evidence cannot be reviewed on habeas corpus. If we assume, without deciding, that the question is properly before us, the trial court struck out the reference to a prior arrest, and we think the denial of a motion for mistrial was not an abuse of discretion under the circumstances.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Azulay v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
135 A.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Rice v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
135 A.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Woods v. Warden
137 A.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.2d 129, 213 Md. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-2001.