Harley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harley v. State

493 S.W.3d 477, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 2016 WL 3769304

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 12, 2016

DocketED 103110

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 477 (Harley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harley v. State, 493 S.W.3d 477, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 2016 WL 3769304 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Jeremy R. Harley appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying after evi-dentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based -on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.-

-We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only;' setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■ Jeremy R. Harley appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying after evi-dentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based -on claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.-

-We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only;' setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 477, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 2016 WL 3769304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-v-state-moctapp-2016.