Harley v. State

399 So. 2d 1107, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 So. 2d 382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1981·No. Nos. 80-1128, 80-1151·Published

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

The trial court correctly denied appellant’s motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds, so we affirm. Appellant was charged with escape. There is a question as to the date of his apprehension, but even if we accept his view, speedy trial time had not run. Since appellant was a prisoner when he escaped, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(b)(1) applies, Travis v. State, 364 So.2d 870, 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), and trial must commence within one year from the date of his recapture or within 180 days of his demand for speedy trial. Neither period had run at the time appellant entered his plea.

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harley v. State, 399 So. 2d 1107, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20366 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

399 So. 2d 1107 (Harley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Travis v. State
364 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)