Harley v. Meshoppen Water Co.
This text of 34 A. 568 (Harley v. Meshoppen Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are far from being convinced that the learned court below erred in refusing to continue the preliminary injunction.
We purposely abstain from any expression of opinion as to any of the questions now presented, or that are likely to arise as the case progresses to final hearing and decree. It is neither [421]*421necessary nor desirable that we should do otherwise. When the case is developed and the facts are fully established, questions, which may now appear to be of some importance, may be entirely ehminated.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 568, 174 Pa. 416, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-v-meshoppen-water-co-pa-1896.