Harley v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

76 So. 3d 390, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20904, 2011 WL 6851316
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2011·No. 1D11-4232·Published

Opinion

*391 PER CURIAM.

The appeal and cross-appeal are hereby DISMISSED. Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal where order granted motion and failed to enter judgment); Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal where order on appeal was not an appealable partial final judgment); Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (finding that a proper exercise of the Court’s discretion, provided under rule 9.110(Z), is dismissal of the appeal).

LEWIS, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harley v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 76 So. 3d 390, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20904, 2011 WL 6851316 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

76 So. 3d 390 (Harley v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Benton v. Moore
655 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hickox v. Taylor
933 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)