Harley Hurst v. United States
This text of 217 F.2d 311 (Harley Hurst v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
217 F.2d 311
Harley HURST, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 4956.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Nov. 18, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Eugene Rice, Judge.
L. P. Paul Weadick, Denver, Colo., Robert J. Hill, Witchita, Kan., for appellant.
Frank D. McSherry, U.S. Atty., Harry G. Fender, Asst. U.S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255. On authority of Hurst v. United States, 10 Cir., 177 F.2d 894, the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 F.2d 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-hurst-v-united-states-ca10-1954.