Harlem Transfer Co. v. Friedlander

272 A.D.2d 1043

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1043 (Harlem Transfer Co. v. Friedlander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlem Transfer Co. v. Friedlander, 272 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

The premises involved herein were not under the protection of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.). There is ample evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the premises involved are pier, dock and wharf property and so do not come within the protection of the statute. Determination of the Appellate Term, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with costs [1044]*1044and disbursements to the landlord in this court and $30 costs in the Appellate Term, and the final order of the Municipal Court affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlem-transfer-co-v-friedlander-nyappdiv-1947.