Harlem Card & Paper Co. v. Taylor-Logan Co., Paper-Makers

D.C. Circuit

Harlem Card & Paper Co. v. Taylor-Logan Co., Paper-Makers

10 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2336, 56 App. D.C. 149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1926

DocketNo. 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F.2d 1014 (Harlem Card & Paper Co. v. Taylor-Logan Co., Paper-Makers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harlem Card & Paper Co. v. Taylor-Logan Co., Paper-Makers, 10 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2336, 56 App. D.C. 149 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a trade-mark opposition proceeding, sustaining appellee’s opposition to the registration by the appellant of the trade-mark “Public Safety Bond”; no claim being made to the exclusive use of the word “Bond,” “apart from the mark.”

The opposer’s mark is “Public Service Bond,” and the goods of the two parties are of the same descriptive properties. That confusion would be likely to result from concurrent use of the two marks is too obvious to require discussion. The decision therefore is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a trade-mark opposition proceeding, sustaining appellee’s opposition to the registration by the appellant of the trade-mark “Public Safety Bond”; no claim being made to the exclusive use of the word “Bond,” “apart from the mark.”

The opposer’s mark is “Public Service Bond,” and the goods of the two parties are of the same descriptive properties. That confusion would be likely to result from concurrent use of the two marks is too obvious to require discussion. The decision therefore is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2336, 56 App. D.C. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlem-card-paper-co-v-taylor-logan-co-paper-makers-cadc-1926.