Home/New York Court of Appeals/Harland Enterprises, Inc. v. Commander Oil Corp.

Harland Enterprises, Inc. v. Commander Oil Corp.

475 N.E.2d 104, 64 N.Y.2d 708, 485 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4891
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 475 N.E.2d 104 (Harland Enterprises, Inc. v. Commander Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harland Enterprises, Inc. v. Commander Oil Corp., 475 N.E.2d 104, 64 N.Y.2d 708, 485 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4891 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

This action was brought for damages sustained when plaintiffs’ warehouse was destroyed by fire. Defendant oil company, whose carelessness in repairing an oil burner located on the premises is alleged to have started the fire, cross-claimed against defendant fire department for negligence in fighting the fire. Special Term granted the fire department’s motion to dismiss the cross claim on the grounds that no special duty to provide fire protection was owed to the oil company, and that mere errors of judgment on the part of the fire department in the course of fire fighting are not actionable. The Appellate Division affirmed on similar grounds and, subsequently, this court granted leave to appeal.

A fire department is not chargeable with negligence for failure to exercise perfect judgment in discharging the governmental function of fighting fires. (McGee v Adams Paper & Twine Co., 26 AD2d 186, 198-199, affd 20 NY2d 921; see, also, Rottkamp v Young, 15 NY2d 831, affg 21 AD2d 373.) The fire department’s discretionary efforts in attempting to extinguish the fire in this case are not grounds for liability.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cody H. v. State of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 25162 (New York State Court of Claims, 2025)
Stevens & Thompson Paper Co. Inc. v. Middle Falls Fire Dept., Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 06996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Drever v. State of New York
134 A.D.3d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc.
995 N.E.2d 131 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Wiley
60 A.D.3d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
AMW Materials Testing, Inc. v. Town of Babylon
348 F. Supp. 2d 4 (E.D. New York, 2004)
Angnabooguk v. State
26 P.3d 447 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2001)
Stata v. Village of Waterford
225 A.D.2d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rodriguez v. City of New York
189 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Schekter v. Long Island Lighting Co.
137 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Kenavan v. City of New York
517 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Fowler v. Town of Ticonderoga
131 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Helman v. County of Warren
114 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Laresca v. City of New York
108 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 N.E.2d 104, 64 N.Y.2d 708, 485 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harland-enterprises-inc-v-commander-oil-corp-ny-1984.