Harlan v. Watson
This text of 39 Ind. 393 (Harlan v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was commenced by the appellees against Joshua K. Harlan, Sr., Arttissa Harlan, Joshua K. Harlan, Jr., John O. Harlan, Rosa B. Harlan, and Josiah M. Clark, to set aside certain conveyances as made to defraud creditors. There was judgment against the defendants. Part of them appeal, and the assignment of errors is by Arttissa Harlan alone, in her own behalf and as guardian ad litem for Joshua K. Harlan, Jr., John C. Harlan, and Rosa B. Harlan.
We think the appeal will have to be dismissed. A guardian ad litem cannot appeal in his or her own name. But in addition to this there is no appeal by the other defendants, nor is any notice served on them,' as required by 2 G. & H. 270, sec. 551; and see Kirby v. Holmes, 6 Ind. 33.
T¿ie appeal is dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 Ind. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-watson-ind-1872.