Harlan v. Morgan
This text of 44 App. D.C. 332 (Harlan v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered thé opinion of the Court:
The bill does not set out what defenses were relied upon m the action at law.
We áre of the "opinion that the court was right in dismissing the bill.
If "error was committed in the exclusion of his evidence, he had his remedy by an'appeal, which he took and abandoned.
[335]*335There is no ground of equity jurisdiction alleged, and the decree must be affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 App. D.C. 332, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-morgan-cadc-1916.