Harlan v. Jones

3 N.E. 826, 104 Ind. 167, 1885 Ind. LEXIS 411
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1885
DocketNo. 12,228
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 3 N.E. 826 (Harlan v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlan v. Jones, 3 N.E. 826, 104 Ind. 167, 1885 Ind. LEXIS 411 (Ind. 1885).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The material allegations of the appellee’s complaint are these: Creditors of Joshua K. Harlan obtained judgments against him, and also obtained a decree declaring that a conveyance to his wife, the appellant, of the land described in the complaint, was fraudulent, and adjudged that it be set aside. On these judgments the land was sold, the appellee purchased it, and subsequently received a deed from the sheriff. A complaint to review the judgment, declaring the conveyance fraudulent, was afterwards filed by the appellant, and she succeeded in having that judgment annulled. The appellee redeemed the land from a tax sale and also paid taxes that accrued upon the land, and this suit was brought to enforce a lien for the taxes paid.

[168]*168Filed Dec. 9, 1885.

The appellant’s counsel contend that the payment of the taxes by the appellee was voluntary. This position is not tenable. The appellee had color of title, and, indeed, as long as the judgment declaring the land to be subject to sale on the executions against Joshua K. Harlan stood unreversed, he-had a valid title. He can not, therefore, be deemed a mere volunteer. He did not pay the taxes for the purpose of making himself the creditor of the appellant, but for the purpose of protecting from sale land to which it had been adjudged by a court of general/jurisdiction the appellant had no title. In no just sense can the appellee be regarded as a volunteer, seeking to make another his debtor. We have no doubt that the appellee has a right to enforce a lien for the taxes paid by him.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Froderman v. Dietz
92 N.E.2d 553 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1950)
Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. Martin
25 P.2d 435 (California Supreme Court, 1933)
Perkins v. Indiana Manufacturing Co.
108 N.E. 165 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Bannse v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
205 F. 328 (W.D. Washington, 1913)
Harrington v. Demaris
77 P. 603 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Schissel v. Dickson
28 N.E. 540 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.E. 826, 104 Ind. 167, 1885 Ind. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-jones-ind-1885.