Harlan v. Harris

17 Ind. 328, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 426
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 9, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 17 Ind. 328 (Harlan v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlan v. Harris, 17 Ind. 328, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 426 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Worden, J.

Suit by Harris as holder, against the appellants as indorsers, of certain promissory notes. Issue; trial, finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

On the trial, it became material for the plaintiff' to prove, in order to show the insolvency of John Shirty, the maker of the notes, that a certain piece of land owned by him, and mortgaged to secure the payment of the notes, had been sold on execution against him. This the Court permitted, over the objection of the defendants, on the ground that the [329]*329evidence was secondary, to be proved by parol. A new trial was asked on this ground.

II. 8. Kelley, for the appellants. J. II. Jones, for the appellee.

We think the Court erred in admitting parol evidence to prove such sale. The judgment, execution and return thereon, or a transcript thereof, and the sheriff’s deed, were primary evidence, and should have been produced, or their absence accounted for.

Per Guriam. — The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Com'rs of Cass County v. Nevitt
448 N.E.2d 333 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983)
Nietert v. Trentman
4 N.E. 306 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Splahn v. Gillespie
48 Ind. 397 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ind. 328, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-harris-ind-1861.