Harlan v. Harlan

263 U.S. 681, 44 S. Ct. 135, 68 L. Ed. 504, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2851
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 3, 1923
DocketNo. 104
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 U.S. 681 (Harlan v. Harlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlan v. Harlan, 263 U.S. 681, 44 S. Ct. 135, 68 L. Ed. 504, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2851 (1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case has become moot, because of the institution of the second suit in the Supreme [682]*682Court of the District of Columbia, and the passing of the property involved to the receiver in that suit, with the consent of the plaintiff in this. The cause is therefore remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to modify its previous decree and enter an order remanding the cause to the Supreme Court of the District directing it to dismiss the case as moot, awarding no costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Compañia General, 249 U. S. 425, 426-7; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359, 362; Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13, 15-16.

Mr. Henry E. Davis for appellant. Mr. Henry S. Bobbins for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meek v. Centre County Banking Co.
264 U.S. 499 (Supreme Court, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 U.S. 681, 44 S. Ct. 135, 68 L. Ed. 504, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-v-harlan-scotus-1923.