Harlan Kerman v. H & L Realty & Management Company Lb Real Properties Corporation Merle Thompson Nancy Bloomgarden Prime Properties Mark Stone

41 F.3d 1513, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38985, 1994 WL 651954
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1994
Docket93-16020
StatusUnpublished

This text of 41 F.3d 1513 (Harlan Kerman v. H & L Realty & Management Company Lb Real Properties Corporation Merle Thompson Nancy Bloomgarden Prime Properties Mark Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harlan Kerman v. H & L Realty & Management Company Lb Real Properties Corporation Merle Thompson Nancy Bloomgarden Prime Properties Mark Stone, 41 F.3d 1513, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38985, 1994 WL 651954 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

41 F.3d 1513

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Harlan KERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
H & L REALTY & MANAGEMENT COMPANY; LB Real Properties
Corporation; Merle Thompson; Nancy Bloomgarden;
Prime Properties; Mark Stone,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-16020.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1994.
Decided Nov. 18, 1994.

Before: CANBY, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

The district court correctly concluded that Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. v. KN Energy, Inc., 498 U.S. 426 (1991) (per curiam), did not overturn Owen Equipment & Erection Company v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365 (1978). Freeport at 428-29. For the plaintiff to add nondiverse defendants to a diversity action still destroys diversity. See Owen at 374. Mr. Hirsh therefore wrongly relied on Freeport as authority for his addition of Mark Stone and Prime Properties, Inc. as defendants.

The district court erred, however, in imposing Rule 11 sanctions against Hirsh without first giving the required notice. Tom Growney Equip., Inc. v. Shelley Irrigation Dev., 834 F.2d 833, 836-37 (9th Cir.1987). The entertainment of Hirsh's subsequent motion to vacate the order imposing sanctions did not cure the court's error because Hirsh, as movant, carried the burden of overturning a decision already reached. Id. at 837.

We vacate the order imposing sanctions and remand to the district court with instructions to provide Hirsh with notice of the court's intent to impose sanctions and a hearing prior to the imposition of any sanction.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 F.3d 1513, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38985, 1994 WL 651954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harlan-kerman-v-h-l-realty-management-company-lb-real-properties-ca9-1994.