Harkness v. Territory

1910 OK CR 75, 106 P. 558, 3 Okla. Crim. 628, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 25, 1910·No. No. A-46.·Published

Opinion

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

On the 28th day of October, 1907, judgment was rendered against the defendant. The record was not filed in this court until December 3, 1908. Under the law in force at the date of the rendition of the judgment in this case, it was necessary that an appeal, in a criminal case, should be taken within one year after the date of the judgment. This time having expired before the record ijn this case was filed in this court, we are without jurisdiction to consider the case. Boneparte v. United States, ante; p. 345, 106 Pac. 347, If a defendant can file a record in this court after the time for perfecting the appeal has expired, there would be no limit to the time in which an appeal could be perfected.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

DOYLE and OWEN, Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harkness v. Territory, 1910 OK CR 75, 106 P. 558, 3 Okla. Crim. 628, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 172 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

1910 OK CR 75 (Harkness v. Territory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boneparte v. United States
1910 OK CR 3 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)