Harkness v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harkness v. State

655 So. 2d 186, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5347, 1995 WL 299043

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2751

StatusPublished

This text of 655 So. 2d 186 (Harkness v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harkness v. State, 655 So. 2d 186, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5347, 1995 WL 299043 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of a judgment of conviction and sentence for six counts of burglary of a dwelling and ten counts of dealing in stolen property, appellant argues that the lower court improperly delegated to appellant’s probation officer the duty of determining the amount of restitution to be paid to Ruth Harkness. See, Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The state concedes error on this point.

We vacate the order of probation and remand for further proceedings on the question of the amount of restitution to be paid to Ruth Harkness. In all other respects, the judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI