Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Harkness v. SAIf Corp.

Harkness v. SAIf Corp.

15 P.3d 103, 171 Or. App. 329, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2001
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 6, 2000
Docket97-08467; CA A104207
StatusPublished

This text of 15 P.3d 103 (Harkness v. SAIf Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harkness v. SAIf Corp., 15 P.3d 103, 171 Or. App. 329, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2001 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a workers’ compensation case in which claimant seeks review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of compensation. He contends that the Board erred in affirming SAIF’s denial of coverage because its denial was premature under our holding in Croman Corp. v. Serrano, 163 Or App 136, 986 P2d 1253 (1999). Because the Board did not make a finding as to whether acceptance occurred before the denial in question, we remand for reconsideration. Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc., 171 Or App 263, 15 P3d 101 (2000).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Croman Corp. v. Serrano
986 P.2d 1253 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)
Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc.
15 P.3d 101 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 P.3d 103, 171 Or. App. 329, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harkness-v-saif-corp-orctapp-2000.