Harkinson v. Manchester
5 A.2d 721, 90 N.H. 554, 1939 N.H. LEXIS 97
Opinion
This case is governed by the rule stated in Piasecny
v. Manchester, 82 N. H. 458. Whether contemporary expansions of the field of governmental activities demand a corresponding expansion of the scope of municipal liability for the manner of performing public duties, is a matter for legislative rather than judicial determination.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harkinson v. Manchester, 5 A.2d 721, 90 N.H. 554, 1939 N.H. LEXIS 97 (N.H. 1939).
5 A.2d 721 (Harkinson v. Manchester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Dover v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.
575 A.2d 1280 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1990)
McGrath v. City of Manchester
307 A.2d 830 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1973)
Thomas v. Potomac Electric Power Company
266 F. Supp. 687 (District of Columbia, 1967)
Day v. City of Berlin
157 F.2d 323 (First Circuit, 1946)
Felton v. City of Great Falls
169 P.2d 229 (Montana Supreme Court, 1946)