Harkins v. Gauthe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Harkins v. Gauthe

661 So. 2d 1366, 1995 La. LEXIS 2563, 1995 WL 638509

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harkins v. Gauthe. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 La. LEXIS 1956 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 27, 1995·No. No. 95-CC-1746·Published

Opinion

In re Gauthe, Gilbert, Father; Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co.; — Pacific Employers Ins. Co.; Houston General Ins. Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 93-3086; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW95-0728.

Granted. Ruling of trial court reversed. Trial court is ordered to allow IME by Dr. Roniger.

KIMBALL, J., would deny on the showing made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gauthe, Gilbert, Father; Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co.; — Pacific Employers Ins. Co.; Houston General Ins. Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 93-3086; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW95-0728.

Granted. Ruling of trial court reversed. Trial court is ordered to allow IME by Dr. Roniger.

KIMBALL, J., would deny on the showing made.

Harkins v. Gauthe, 661 So. 2d 1366, 1995 La. LEXIS 2563, 1995 WL 638509 (La. 1995).

Pincite

661 So. 2d 1366 (Harkins v. Gauthe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.