Harkin v. Ramirez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harkin v. Ramirez

259 A.D.2d 520, 684 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 520 (Harkin v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harkin v. Ramirez, 259 A.D.2d 520, 684 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death and medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated February 9, 1998, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center which was, in effect, to confirm the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the cross motion of the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center which was, in effect, to confirm the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404. After the complaint was dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiff failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to vacate such dismissal (see generally, Iazzetta v Vicenzi, 243 AD2d 540; Fico v Health Ins. Plan, 248 AD2d 432). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death and medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated February 9, 1998, as granted the cross motion of the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center which was, in effect, to confirm the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the cross motion of the defendant Long Island Jewish Medical Center which was, in effect, to confirm the dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404. After the complaint was dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiff failed to satisfy the requirements necessary to vacate such dismissal (see generally, Iazzetta v Vicenzi, 243 AD2d 540; Fico v Health Ins. Plan, 248 AD2d 432). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 520, 684 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harkin-v-ramirez-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack