Harker v. Hough

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Harker v. Hough

7 N.J.L. 428

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 15, 1802

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.J.L. 428 (Harker v. Hough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harker v. Hough, 7 N.J.L. 428 (N.J. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The matter set forth in the defendant’s plea is a conclusive bar to the action. On a demurrer, the fact must be presumed as pleaded; and, if so, there cannot remain a doubt that the award is a nullity, and that the defendant has availed himself of the defect in a legal manner. There must be judgment for the plea.

Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The matter set forth in the defendant’s plea is a conclusive bar to the action. On a demurrer, the fact must be presumed as pleaded; and, if so, there cannot remain a doubt that the award is a nullity, and that the defendant has availed himself of the defect in a legal manner. There must be judgment for the plea.

Judgment for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.J.L. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harker-v-hough-nj-1802.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack