Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co.

Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co.

13 Misc. 2d 437, 180 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3100
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 17, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 Misc. 2d 437 (Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co., 13 Misc. 2d 437, 180 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the plaintiff, and defendant’s motion to open its default and vacate the- judgment entered thereon denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers. The defendant failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that it has a meritorious defense to the action (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562).

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brows", JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jormar Construction Co. v. Tinawi
30 Misc. 3d 410 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Misc. 2d 437, 180 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harkavy-v-bay-state-manufacturing-co-nyappterm-1958.