Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co.
13 Misc. 2d 437, 180 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3100
Opinion
The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $10 costs to the plaintiff, and defendant’s motion to open its default and vacate the- judgment entered thereon denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers. The defendant failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that it has a meritorious defense to the action (Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562).
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brows", JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co., 13 Misc. 2d 437, 180 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
13 Misc. 2d 437 (Harkavy v. Bay State Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jormar Construction Co. v. Tinawi
30 Misc. 3d 410 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2010)